Cookies on Kythene

We use cookies and similar technologies for the things below. You can accept all, reject everything except what's essential, or pick what you're OK with.

Preferences
Remembers things like your last workspace and how you had a list sorted. Improves the experience but the site works without.
Improvement
Anonymous usage measurement so we can fix bugs and prioritise work.
Marketing
Lets us measure whether ads we run send people who actually use the site. We don't share personal data with advertisers.

Read our cookies policy and the privacy policy. California residents: Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information.

Loading…

Bringing the rest of the team with you

One of you runs AI all day. The other four don't, and that's fine.

No team becomes AI-native all at once. It starts with one person who's gone a long way with AI, and colleagues who've tried it, found it uneven, and gone back to what works. Kythene is worth having at exactly that point - and none of them has to change how they work to get the benefit.

The situation

The AI work is real and it's invisible. One person's sessions produce research, drafts, analyses and decisions that the rest of the team never sees, can't check, and quietly doesn't trust - because trusting it means taking a colleague's word that a machine got it right. So the work gets redone, or it gets used without anyone checking it, and both of those are worse than the thing they replaced.

Every tool aimed at this problem asks the sceptics to adopt something. That's the ask they've already declined.

What the other four actually do

They read and they judge. That's the whole job, and it's the one they're best at. Work published into Kythene arrives on a timeline they can open in a browser - no assistant, no MCP, no new habit. They read the result, flag the paragraph that's wrong, approve the rest, and the pages in the wiki that the team relies on carry their sign-off rather than one person's confidence.

That judgement isn't busywork for them either - it's what stops the AI work being a liability. And it flows back: their block-level notes reach the author's assistant over MCP, so the correction lands in the next version instead of in a meeting.

No tool to adopt

Reading, commenting and approving all happen in a browser. Somebody who has never opened an AI assistant can do every bit of it.

Scepticism is the feature

The colleague who says "that's not right" is doing the most valuable thing in the loop. Kythene gives them the place to say it, against the exact block.

Room to start later

When one of them does connect an assistant, everything the team already settled is there for it to recall on day one - no catching up, and nothing for them to set up beyond the connection itself.

What it costs them

If they're on your team they're a seat, the same as anyone. If they sit outside it - a client, a contractor, a colleague in another department you want a second opinion from - bring them in on a share link and they read, comment and approve for free, with no account at all. Your AI instances are always free. See pricing →

The win: the AI work becomes checkable by the people best placed to check it - without asking any of them to change how they work.

Make the AI work checkable.

You connect your assistant. They open a browser. That's the whole setup.